November 17, 2009

A Christmas Carol 3D

achristmascarol2_largeAnother version of A Christmas Carol? Is there a reason I should get excited about this or a reason to just care one way or the other? I mean it is not like we are not already born knowing this story and it is not like I cannot find another version readily available. With that said, there is still something about the Charles Dickens' story that is awfully inviting. I guess that is way so many people want to try their hand at it. Robert Zemeckis is no different, he has set his sights on the perennial holiday tale and attempted to put his stamp on it.

You know, I am not sure I have ever read the source story, but I feel as if I must have. Beyond that, my most memorable memories of the story come with fictional characters attached. Specifically, Mickey's Christmas Carol and A Muppet Christmas Carol are my strongest experiences with the story, although I have seen the 1951 incarnation with Alastair Sim as Scrooge, as well. The Sim version is the one that is most often cited as the finest version, standing above the myriad incarnations that appeared before and since.

This new Robert Zemeckis version is the twentieth to be filmed, and that does not count all of the television versions (and let us not forget the radio adaptations). Considering how many there are, I am sure there are more than a few of you who have already decided to skip this one. Seriously, who needs another one? Well, let me tell you that while we probably don't need another, they will continue to come, and this one is not half bad. As a matter of fact, it is quite good.


This version felt a lot more accurate and true to the source than I was expecting. When you consider that Jim Carrey was cast as Scrooge and the family might of Disney is putting up the funds, on would have to believe they were going to go for a family-friendly, comedic tone. They didn't. Frankly, there are some scary moments, creepy elements, and an overall darker tone than I was expecting and I was glad for it. While A Christmas Carol is an uplifting type of tale, it has a very strong cautionary element that seems to be played down in many of the versions I have seen.

The movie opens with the opening of the Dickens text and a zoom through the opening sentence: "Marley was dead: to begin with." Emphasis on the word "dead." This was the first sign that this was going to be different. The second sign was the lingering on the dead body of Marley in his wooden coffin as Scrooge haggles price with the undertaker. The third sign is the use of old English style dialogue. These things taken together all contribute to the fresh feel of this film.

I will not give you the plot rundown, we all know about the visits of the three ghosts and the importance of their message. I will say that the scenes shown to good old Ebenezer had more emotional resonance than I was expecting. It has to do with the darker approach to the material. Scrooge is not a nice guy, but you learn a lot about him along the way.


There is something else that struck me about the film. I think it was Jim Carrey in promotional material who said this is one of the greatest ghost stories of all time. Funny thing is that I never looked at this as a ghost story. There is no doubt that it is, but I always saw it as a Christmas movie first. This slight tweak to my thought process opened up a whole new aspect to the film. It was almost like seeing it for the first time.

How about the performances? They are all fine. Jim Carrey does a good job embodying Scrooge at various ages and demeanors. He was recognizable, but restrained and it worked. He also steps into the roles of the ghosts. The Ghost of Christmas Past is a creepy little candle with a habit of flickering his flaming head while wearing a persistent creepy grin. The Ghost of Christmas Present is a big, jolly fellow who has a regal air about him. The supporting cast includes Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, Robin Wright-Penn, and Cary Elwes. Them and others all turn in fine work bringing this to life.

When looking at this film one must not forget Robert Zemeckis who directed and wrote the adaptation. He seems intent on bringing live action and animation together, as seen in his previous two films (Polar Express and Beowulf). His work with motion capture technology is to be applauded and it keeps getting better. A Christmas Carol is the most polished look yet. His characters feel almost real, not quite bridging the uncanny valley but he is trying.


Beyond that, he knows how to use 3D to great effect. It is often like looking through a window. There is depth and volume to the creations and very little in the way of gimmicky "gotcha" moments of things trying to poke you in the eye. 3D may not be the future, but when used properly with reason and restraint it can be an effective tool in the film maker's toolbox.

In addition to the motion capture work, Robert Zemeckis brings a lot of style to the film. His characters zoom freely across the screen yet sill have weight to them. The design of the city is finely detailed. There is even a throwback to one his own live action films (once you see it, you will know what it is).

I left the theater knowing that I liked it. As I sit here writing about it that like is growing into more of a love. You see, Zemeckis is not afraid to take chances, and he took a few with this one, from the darkness, to the scares, to the dialogue. In my eyes everything paid off. Is the film necessary? Ultimately no, but so what. It is a classic tale destined to be told and retold.

Bottomline. It may have been released a bit too soon in the season to be most effective, but there is no denying that it is a very good film. I was drawn in to the style, affected by the emotion, and caught up in the spectacle. This is well worth seeing, although I would hesitate bringing younger children, as there are some frightening moments.


Bookmark and Share


Post a Comment