August 17, 2009

The Time Traveler's Wife

thetimetravelerswife1_smallI have not read Audrey Niffenegger's novel and I do not have any plans to. That said, I was sort of looking forward to this movie, although I did have some reservations. Sure, it is a stereotypical "chick flick," but that is a tag I have never really bought into. It certainly makes for easy short hand when talking about movies, but a good movie will transcend its labels. With The Time Traveler's Wife (which I keep wanting to call The Astronaut's Wife), I am sad to report that while it certainly had some interesting ideas and moments, it fails to come together in any meaningful way leaving this viewer oddly detached from a story that seems designed to draw you in.

I am definitely intrigued by the introduction of science fiction elements to the romance or so-called "chick flick." In this case it is time travel. This is usually something left to Star Trek and Terminator, in this case it is the element on which an epic romance that lasts through the ages. Going in, I was hoping for an experience similar to The Lake House. There is a romance that involves a supernatural time shift based in a mailbox that proves that a high concept romance can work in wonderful fashion. That film did not allow itself to get bogged down in the minutiae of the hows and whys such a thing happens, it just flows so naturally we scarcely think about it until it is all over.

thetimetravelerswife6The Time Traveler's Wife tells of Henry (Eric Bana), a man afflicted with a problem called Chrono-Impairment, a genetic disorder that causes him to travel through time; as he says "It can be a problem." No kidding. He randomly jumps through time, arriving naked wherever he goes, necessitating that he rob the nearest location for some clothing. Some of his jumps take him back to big moments, like the death of his mother. Another moment is the fateful jump he makes back in time where he meets young Claire (Rachel McAdams) in a pleasant meadow outside of her home. He introduces himself and says that they are friends when she is grown up. At this moment, the young girl sees her future with this grown stranger.

Jump ahead to the future and we see a grown Claire meet Henry, who works in a library. She introduces herself, although he has no idea who she is, not having jumped back into her life yet (don't think too hard, it will only give you a headache). Anyway, a romance interrupted ensues and we see them together, get married, and live a troubled life together. It is one filled with happiness, but as with all things, problems creep in. For Claire and Henry, we get the unique problem of him leaving for another time.

The idea of spontaneously jumping through time is an interesting one. The concept offers much in the way of story possibilities assuming, of course, that this brand of time travel comes complete with a static time line, unlike, say, the one of Back to the Future where the present can be changed drastically by events in the past. Henry does say at one point things that happen will happen despite anything he tries to do in the past to change them.

thetimetravelerswife3What? Hold on a minute, then Henry and Claire were going to meet and fall in love regardless? He did not need to borderline invade the young girl's mind at her tender young age? Then what was the point of their meetings in the meadow? Like I said, if you think about it too hard, you will surely give yourself a headache.

All right, let's just accept that what happens will happen regardless. Does their romance deliver? I really want to say it does, but it falls short. They are shot lovingly by director Robert Schwentke, but the actual chemistry between the two leads is pretty low. It looked like they were told how to react and did it rather than reacting to each other. It made for a relationship that did not connect with me.

Despite the lack of any real emotional involvement, I still found myself enjoying it. It was the time travel aspect, the comedic situations it brought up, the potential paradoxes it causes, and it was an interesting way to build a relationship. Not to mention the ability to disappear on your wedding day and have an older version of you jump in and take your own place.

thetimetravelerswife4There is another element that has bothered me ever since the first trailer arrived. That is the creepy factor. Seriously, there is really something creepy about this movie and the dawn of the romance, not to mention the continuing nature of it. We are supposed to believe that a young girl's dream is to meet the man of her dreams and grow up to marry him and live happily ever after. This is what happens to Claire, she is never given the opportunity to find this man. He pretty much just appears out of thin air, announces himself, and forever seals this girls romantic future. Beyond that, it is really creepy the way he talks to her. It is all in the trailer, just think about how you would feel if a forty-something guy talked to your daughter like that.

There were moments where the relationship threatened to get interesting, but they chose to keep the fantasy and bittersweet romance alive rather than make it a bit more real. For example, think about when she is upset about his disappearances, this could have made it all more interesting. Another opportunity was when she got pregnant and when she was trying to get pregnant, as soon as it threatened the romance with a truer reality, we had to move along.

Despite everything, I enjoyed the film. The idea is interesting and there is decent execution or it. The lead actors are individually fine, but weak when taken together. I don't know. It has a unique blend of the interesting and the creepy, with a good dose of faux-emotion.

Mildly Recommended.


middlesex said...

I like title more than movie.

Post a Comment