tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6859786.post6927857081139675181..comments2023-10-08T04:43:56.399-04:00Comments on Critical Outcast: Movie Review: House (2008)Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18118353249323488438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6859786.post-53373932412379806922008-11-16T20:50:00.000-05:002008-11-16T20:50:00.000-05:00Thanks for stopping by, Anonymous.I have to say th...Thanks for stopping by, Anonymous.<BR/><BR/>I have to say that if you need to read the book to understand the movie, the movie was not made properly. The two should be able to exist on their own without needing the other for support.<BR/><BR/>The political cartoon comparison does not apply, as the cartoon is commenting on something else, that is not the case with a book/movie combination.<BR/><BR/>The book may be good, I am not denying that as I have not read it, but to need it to get the movie? No thanks, that is not the way it is supposed to work.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18118353249323488438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6859786.post-17359060365713894502008-11-16T20:44:00.000-05:002008-11-16T20:44:00.000-05:00Well, its good to see someone has seen the movie. ...Well, its good to see someone has seen the movie. But the only thing I think is missing from your experience, in order to understand the movie, is to read the book! You can never get a real political cartoon without having some idea or what it is refering to. Same in this instance. You can never really understand a movie based on a book without reading the book. One it makes the movie more interesting. And two it drives the deeper meaning of the book into you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com